Home
Site Updates
Purchase Forms
List of Forms
Insurance Questions - CA
Insurance Answers - CA
Legal Questions - CA
Legal Answers - CA
Legal Questions - WI
Legal Answers - WI
Miscellaneous Articles
A-1-131 Forms
CEM-2505 Forms
Change Order Forms
Invoice Forms
Labor Release Forms
Lien Waiver Forms
Mechanic Lien Forms
NJ Payroll Forms
NonResponsibility Forms
AZ Prelim Notices
CA Prelim Notices
All States Prelim Forms
More Prelim Info
Proposal/Bid Forms
Warranty Forms
WH-347/348 Forms
Questions and Answers
Mechanic Lien Q's
Prelim Notice Q's
Waiver/Release Q's
Contact Us
Who We Are
Other Resources
Search Our Sites

XML RSS
What is this?
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Add to Google

School girl accuses construction worker of rape. Could one or more of your employees be dishonest, distrustful, even violent?

I read an article about a sixth-grade girl accusing a construction worker of raping her in a bathroom on her school campus. It was determined by the police that the girl was lying and thank goodness it didn't really happen but it has brought on a lot of questions about construction workers being present on school campuses when the students are also present.

Even though it didn't really happen, there is fallout...

And, as a parent I have to honestly say that I agree with all of the suggestions being made by other parents but as a contractor (or past contractor) I recognize that there still remains the question as to whether or not some of the changes are reasonable (but then my parent side kicks in again and says nothing is unreasonable when it comes to the safety of my kids)...

A list of some of the ideas:

  • Installing a separate entrance to a workzone and requiring the construction workers to use that entrance only and barring from the project any worker who doesn't use the special entrance (which could cause a job to suddenly be short on manpower);

  • Requiring background checks and fingerprinting of contractors and their employees just like they require of teachers and other school workers (in all honesty, having been unfortunate enough to hire some what turned out to be really scary guys that I most definitely would not want around my children, this is something contractors should be doing already);

  • Restricting workers from areas where children might be present (which may be possible provided the school has a place to put the children when the work that's being done is in an area where the children are normally present);

  • Restricting construction work to non-school hours such as night, weekend, holiday and summer hours (which would most likely greatly increase the expense of already expensive union-priced work);

  • Requiring children to travel in pairs (which could cost a child the expense of missing part of a lesson), requiring more teachers in the hallways between classes (this has always been a huge duh-huh with us), and more police to be stationed at the schools (which while this would hopefully keep the children safe it's still a sad thought, that we need policemen stationed at our schools, in the United States of America)

Depending on what state you're in, chances are you were fingerprinted and your background was investigated by the licensing board as part of your licensing procedure. So why not your employees? Chances are that most of the folks working for you are good guys but all it takes is that one bad apple to cost you big time.

Be informed and at least know who you're hiring by conducting background checks and even possibly fingerprints. It's not enough anymore to have a potential employee fill out an application, interview him and contact past employers. Heck, these days it's a good idea to even check up on those who are already working for you!


footer for school girl accuses construction worker of rape page